Suggest a clinic
← Back to the register

Mais Cirurgia — surgical intermediation service (SP)

Operates via Hospital San Gennaro, Alto da Mooca, São Paulo
Surgical intermediation service (marketplace) · operating surgeons not named
verification pending
not confirmed in CFM as of date verification hold · H3
Live public surface + working contact (as of date)
Offers/organises surgery in São Paulo, not a bare aggregator
Named, identifiable responsible surgeon
In scope (plastic / aesthetic surgery in São Paulo)
data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
maiscirurgia.com.br
Measured · 80%
M1 · Active CRM-SP registration (responsible surgeon) 3 · 6%
UNVERIFIED The named technical lead, Dr. Luiz Carlos de Castro, displays CRM 41.901 (status Regular in the CFM portal on 2026-07-11); the surgeons who operate are not named and have no published CRM-SP.
M2 · RQE specialty title — Cirurgia Plástica (CFM) 1 · 28%
UNVERIFIED The named technical lead, Dr. Luiz Carlos de Castro (CRM 41.901), is listed in the CFM portal with an RQE in Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo and practice in Cirurgia Bariátrica, not in Cirurgia Plástica, on 2026-07-11; he is the technical lead of the intermediation company, not the per-case operating surgeon.
M3 · SBCP membership (name-matched in the public directory) — · 6%
OFFICIAL No operating surgeon is named, so there is no name to match in the SBCP directory; the public directory is only accessible via a JavaScript search, not independently verifiable in this pass. · provisional
M4 · Named, identifiable responsible surgeon 2 · 18%
UNVERIFIED Intermediation model: a single named figurehead technical lead (Dr. Luiz Carlos de Castro, CRM 41.901) fronts the company, which describes itself as an intermediary; the surgeons who actually operate are not named, on 2026-07-11.
M5 · Responsible legal entity — active CNPJ 3 · 8%
OFFICIAL CNPJ 41.467.274/0001-72 (MAIS CIRURGIA INTEGRADA LTDA), status Ativa (opened in 2021), with a primary CNAE for ambulatory medical activity restricted to consultations — consistent with an intermediation company that does not operate directly.
M6 · Facility / care-location traceability (CNES) 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED The company discloses the care facility as «Hospital San Gennaro, no Alto da Mooca» — a named third-party hospital to which it refers patients; the surgical team at that hospital is not named and no CNES number is disclosed.
M7 · Documentary transparency (credentials, consent, terms) 2 · 7%
UNVERIFIED It shows only the figurehead technical lead's CRM, without operating-surgeon credentials; no labelled before/after gallery; no fixed prices («condições únicas», «plano personalizado» after contact capture); no consent/risk document.
Editorial · 20%
E1 · Advertising honesty (Resolução CFM 2.336/2023) 2 · 10%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Advertising with outcome promise and superlative («resultados excepcionais», «Sua transformação é a nossa paixão») and an urgency hook («Sua cirurgia não pode esperar»), while the company itself does not perform the surgery.
E2 · PT/EN/ES cross-front consistency 5 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Portuguese-only content; there are no English or Spanish versions, so there is no divergence across language fronts.
E3 · Decision-path clarity 2 · 4%
UNVERIFIED editorial — A lead-capture-first decision path: the patient enters through the intermediation funnel → «plano personalizado» quoted after contact → referral to Hospital San Gennaro → operated by an undisclosed surgeon; accountability sits with an intermediary, not the operator.
Editorial verdict. The company explicitly describes itself as a «serviço de intermediação» between patient and surgeon: it keeps a named technical lead with an active CRM (Dr. Luiz Carlos de Castro), whose RQE registered with the CFM is in Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, not in Cirurgia Plástica, and it does not disclose which surgeon operates each case, referring patients to Hospital San Gennaro. In this model the verification spine — a responsible physician with an RQE in Cirurgia Plástica tied to the operator — could not be confirmed, the index is withheld, and the record takes no position in the table. This is a structural description of the intermediation model and a neutral statement about verifiability, not an accusation; the right of reply remains open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a surgery, a surgeon's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the CRM-SP registration and RQE specialty, the responsible entity (CNPJ), the surgeon's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.