Clínica SER — Dr Cintia Rios and Dr Carlos Camilo, Jardim Paulistano (São Paulo)
84ICo
verified in CFM (CRM + RQE) · Coverage 86% verification hold · H1 Live public surface + working contact (as of date)
Offers/organises surgery in São Paulo, not a bare aggregator
Named, identifiable responsible surgeon
In scope (plastic / aesthetic surgery in São Paulo)
data as of 2026-07-11 · editor-reviewed
www.sercirurgiaplastica.com.br Measured · 80%
M1 · Active CRM-SP registration (responsible surgeon) 5 · 6%
UNVERIFIED The Portal CFM (busca-medicos) confirms both partners with situação Regular (active) as of 2026-07-11: Cintia Rios Camilo (CRM-SP 84535) and Carlos Henrique Camilo (CRM-SP 86838).
M2 · RQE specialty title — Cirurgia Plástica (CFM) 5 · 28%
UNVERIFIED The Portal CFM (busca-medicos) confirms the RQE in Cirurgia Plástica for both partners as of 2026-07-11: Cintia Rios (RQE 21286) and Carlos Camilo (RQE 46330).
M3 · SBCP membership (name-matched in the public directory) — · 6%
OFFICIAL SBCP membership self-claimed («Membro Titular da SBCP» for both), not confirmed in the public SBCP directory as of 2026-07-11; pending. Internal inconsistency: Dr Camilo's CV page says «Membro especialista» (a lower grade than the «Titular» stated on his profile). · provisional
M4 · Named, identifiable responsible surgeon 5 · 18%
UNVERIFIED Two named, profiled responsible surgeons, each with a bio page, CRM, RQE and training, with per-procedure specialization (face → Camilo; body/breast → Rios). Not an anonymous «nossa equipe» or intermediary model.
M5 · Responsible legal entity — active CNPJ — · 8%
UNVERIFIED No CNPJ disclosed on the site (home, /sobre-nos, /contato, terms, privacy) and none located in public registries; the privacy policy names the controller only by trade name. With no digits, the legal entity could not be verified as of 2026-07-11. · provisional
M6 · Facility / care-location traceability (CNES) 4 · 7%
UNVERIFIED Named surgical hospitals on the service page: Vila Nova Star, Saint Peter, Blanc and São Luís Itaim (recognised São Paulo hospitals). Consulting address disclosed. No CNES numbers published.
M7 · Documentary transparency (credentials, consent, terms) 3 · 7%
UNVERIFIED Per-surgeon bio pages (CRM/RQE, training) and a CV; terms of service with a results-vary disclaimer; a privacy policy (LGPD) with a data-officer contact. No formal consent/risk notice; no before/after gallery; indicative price ranges on the service pages (e.g. rhinoplasty R$ 20,280–32,280).
Editorial · 20%
E1 · Advertising honesty (Resolução CFM 2.336/2023) 2 · 10%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Self-proclaimed specialty: the identity is «Cirurgia Plástica Funcional», presented as a distinct methodology/specialty, with Dr Rios styled as its «criadora» («who has already certified 120+ physicians»). Added to this are the absolutes «Naturalidade Absoluta» (repeated) and «Referência Nacional». «Cirurgia Plástica Funcional» is not a CFM-recognised specialty. Recorded verbatim.
E2 · PT/EN/ES cross-front consistency 5 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Single Portuguese front, no EN/ES versions; no factual divergence between language versions. The SBCP grade inconsistency («Titular» vs «especialista») is internal to the same front, recorded under M3.
E3 · Decision-path clarity 4 · 4%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Who consults/operates is clear (two named surgeons, per-procedure specialization) and so is where (hospitals named on the service page). Weaker on formal risk/aftercare documentation, but the patient can identify surgeon, specialization and hospital before booking.
Editorial verdict. Both partners have an active CRM-SP and RQE in Cirurgia Plástica confirmed in the Portal CFM, with named surgical hospitals and clear per-procedure accountability. The H1 hold is structural, not a quality accusation: it stems from presenting a non-CFM-recognised «specialty» («Cirurgia Plástica Funcional») and from advertising absolutes. The right of reply remains open.
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a surgery, a surgeon's talent, the survival of a result, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the CRM-SP registration and RQE specialty, the responsible entity (CNPJ), the surgeon's identity, advertising honesty and documentary transparency — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.